By 2030, pride in place, such as people’s satisfaction with their town centre and engagement in local culture and community, will have risen in every area of the UK, with the gap between top performing and other areas closing.
Whilst not one of the big-ticket infrastructure pledges such as transport this pledge which really focuses on how we feel about the places we live and use in our everyday lives is probably the most crucial to the Government’s plan in that it is the one most voters will judge “levelling up” by as it is the most visible.
This section focuses on three things, so we’ll take them in turn –
Regeneration
This is less about the eye-catching projects and more about looking at some of the drivers of regeneration and how powers can be given to local authorities and MCAs to bring about new investment vehicles. The section also focuses heavily on getting the private sector to invest in regeneration rather than it being simply the domain of the public sector, and by extension the Government.
This is most likely a shift in policy because there is less money available but also because public bodies in recent years have been looking to invest in projects to regenerate an area and to make a financial return and this would make it easier to do. We’ve seen such projects in this area such as Stockton Council’s investment in the Hilton Hotel.
Whilst there are no rabbits out of the hat in terms of announced projects, the Government has committed to a brownfield land fund targeted at Mayoral Combined Authorities (more on the changes to local government and devolution in a forthcoming blog). In this region that means £6m for Tees Valley and £8million for North of Tyne.
Town Centres
Town Centres and retail have often been the Cinderella of Government Policy with very little attention paid to them outside Local Authorities. The original free markets left to, well, the free market.
This change in direction is the Government’s recognition that Town Centres are the bellwethers of the mood of a town, prosper and things are good, decline and it is very visible – especially to voters.
Town Centres have been struggling for a while with declines and changes to shopping patterns only accelerated by Covid. We have had a lot of initiatives in recent months in terms of the sometimes-controversial Towns Deals a Future High Streets funds. These looked to deal with longstanding problems such as eyesores and fragmented land ownership.
The document does promise further measures later but doesn’t go into detail but does promise more help in terms of expertise from the High Streets Taskforce.
It does feel like this is the one they have to get right and quickly if the public is to see progress on levelling up.
Culture, Heritage and Sport
Possibly the most emotive and, arguably one of the central planks of what it really means to level up. This one is about heart, head, and opportunity.
There are measures to expand youth services and programmes such as the National Citizen Service and the Duke of Edinburgh Scheme. It also promises money for youth centres but, there does not seem to be anything for younger children, no resurrection of Sure Start for example.
We don’t have details of the funding packages, presumably there will be the usual competitive bidding processes, which sort of misses the point but there is at least the acknowledgement of the part youth services play in communities.
Community is another area recognised as a policy area which has slipped in recent years. The measures look to make it easier to bring communities together to own and run assets from community centres to sports teams. There is some money allocated but again it is likely to be on a bidding model.
Culture is a wide area where levelling up is about change of mindset rather than simply throwing money at a something. The paper recognises the opportunity to access culture is something missing in so many areas outside London and the major cities. The document looks at investing in cultural assets in towns regions and flagship projects such as Eden North.
Where the paper seeks to change mindsets is not in the regions but in national institutions. The document seeks to change the rules on Arts Council funding with new allocations heavily weighted to projects outside London and the South East.
It also waves a carrot and a substantial stick (in truth it probably needs to be more substantial) at the National Portfolio Organisations (NPOs), such as The British Museum who receive public funding to do far more in the regions.
Rachel Anderson
Assistant Director of Policy
Photo by Charlie Green on Unsplash
